Volunteer Emblem The Missouri Volunteer Movement: News

Bringing Power Back to the People

Left Arrow Back to Home | News Index | Forums | Our Goals | Who We Are | Helping Out | Elections | Community Groups Right Arrow
Volunteer Party HQ | Contact Information

Download Part One
Word Document version
(28K)

PDF version
(189K)


Dec 2015 Issue
Introduction
Part One: State of Corruption
Part Two: County Crooks
Part Three: Bad Neighbors



Articles on this Site
Related Articles:
Stolen Votes
Rotten Districts

J.J.Rizzo: Saga of a Party Prince

Why Some Votes Are More Equal Than Others

Other Articles:
Upside-Down Democracy
The Bureaucracy of Politics
A Lack of Kander


Info Downloads
Maps of Rotten Districts
Maps of Legislator Power
Legislative Committee Analysis
Seniority & Party Analysis
The House's Power Structure


Editorials
Got Moxie?
Donate a Day
Reforming the Legislature



This Article's Sources
State Auditor's Office:
2012 Attorney General audit
2015 Attorney General audit

NY Times 2014 article
Daily Journal's 2015 article

Post-Dispatch's:
2014 story of Koster pledge
2015 story of Koster funds

Project Vote Smart's
current list of Koster's funds

Missouri's Poli-Ticks
December 2015 Bi-Monthly Edition
Volume One, Part One

Justice for Sale

Smiling Shark
Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster

December 2nd, 2015
by Jon Schuessler

Introduction | Part One | Part Two | Part Three

Time in Office: January 1st, 2009 to present
The Charges: Graft, Accepting Corporate Bribes
The Accusers: State Auditor Schweich, The New York Times

Overview:

The Attorney General’s Office is often just a rung on the ladder of a political climb. Jay Nixon, for instance, was the Attorney General before being elected Governor. Chris Koster, the current Attorney General, says that the office is a “political title” for “the corporation of Missouri”. It comes as no surprise, therefore, that Koster has chosen to run for Governor in the upcoming 2016 election.

What does surprise, however, is how openly Mr. Koster has been accepting bribes from corporations under investigation by his office, in the form of gifts and campaign donations.

The first real hint of Koster’s corrupt regime came in 2012, when State Auditor Schweich published a report upon the Attorney General’s Office. The audit cited the highly dubious practice of awarding investigative legal work to firms that had donated to his campaign. During 2011, Koster’s campaign contributions totaled $170,000 from 13 of the 28 firms (46%) who submitted bids to his office for work.

The big unmasking, however, came with a lengthy New York Times article in October of 2014. Mr. Koster, alongside Florida’s Attorney General, Ms. Bondi, were singled out as some of the most corrupt prosecutors in the country.

Corporations such as the drink manufacturer 5-Hour Energy, pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, and telecommunications icon AT&T were all in trouble in Missouri. Through their hired lawyers, these corporations contributed over $50,000 to Koster’s campaign, and over $300,000 to the Democratic Attorneys General Association (DAGA), which, in turn, has paid $1.4 million to Koster’s campaigns.

Pfizer, under litigation by Missouri, invited Koster to be a keynote speaker at a Chicago breakfast meeting. Koster accepted, and five days before speaking, he handed Pfizer a gift in the form of a bargain-basement $750,000 settlement deal. Pfizer executives were pleased – as well they should be, since Oregon, pursuing similar litigation, won a $3.4 million settlement.

AT&T, under fire by multiple states for its billing practices, pleaded its case during Koster’s stay at a plush DAGA conference in Santa Monica, California. They were rewarded soon afterward, when Koster threatened to pull Missouri out of the multi-state lawsuit and proposed that the matter be settled without litigation.

The investigation of 5-Hour Energy was started by Koster’s staff on their own initiative. Koster ended it the instant a 5-Hour Energy lawyer told him about it, who also happened to be at the Santa Monica DAGA conference. A month later, Koster required all of his personnel to get clearance from him before pursuing any public corporation or company with more than 10 employees.

Koster said he got the idea for the policy from a senior executive in the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

(Click here for story about Mineral Area speech)
(Click here for the full 2012 audit by Schweich)
(Click here for the NY Times exclusive)
(Click here for the full 2015 audit by Otto)

The Aftermath:

Shortly after Schweich’s audit in 2012, Koster stopped political contributors from being on the short list for getting contracts from his office.

In November 2014, in response to the New York Times article, Chris Koster made a public promise to “avoid even the appearance of conflict of interest” by no longer accepting contributions from a company within a 90-day period of investigating or suing the company.

In April 2015, Deputy Otto performed an audit of the Attorney General’s Office. It found that Koster had not instituted his promise in a formal policy, and that travel expenses for staff appeared excessive.

Koster bristled at both contentions, denying that his office had acted improperly.

Meanwhile, Koster’s campaign funds have been flourishing. He currently has over $5 million, far more than all of the current Republican candidates for governor combined.

(Click here for 2014 story of Koster pledge)
(Click here to view Koster's self-reported funding)
(Click here for comparison of Koster's funding)


Continue to Part Two | Back to Part One

Jon Schuessler is a Volunteer leader in Jefferson County, and the chairman for Missouri Volunteers for Government Reform, a Political Action Committee (PAC) of the Volunteer Movement. Click here to read his bio or contact him.

You've Got Mail
Order a Free
Volunteer Handbook

Click to order
Manda Gets a Gift
We Welcome All
Donations

Click to donate
Facebook Icon
Join Us
On Facebook

Click to view
Twitter Icon
Follow Us
On Twitter

Click to follow